NSAC says Anderson Silva did not break rules
by Natalia Baage on April 12, 2010

Dana White might be the only one administering a punishment to Anderson Silva after his outlandish display at UFC 112.

According to the UFC's rules, fighters are not allowed to use abusive language inside the Octagon. This includes cursing and antagonizing talk. During his fight at UFC 112, however, Silva taunted Demian Maia and swore at him mid-fight.

The Nevada State Athletic Commission's rules state that a fighter must compete honestly, making the best use of their skills while fighting. Fans, including White and referee Dan Mirgliotta, do not think that Silva adhered to these guidelines.

But some do not see it that way.

"I don't see any way it could (apply)," Keith Kizer, the NSAC executive director told MMAJunkie. "Just because you don't like a guy's style... But a fighter, if he thinks he's ahead on the scorecards, it's not uncommon to see him not take any risks in the last round."

Silva, in essence, did take risks in the latter rounds, refusing to engage Maia in a decent fight. Kizer admits to not yet seeing the fight, but from the literature and emotional response to it, he has gauged the atmosphere's backlash. However, Kizer added that it would be very disrespectful if Silva had not competed to the best of his abilities against Maia.

"I know the fans don't like it," Kizer said. "They want to see toe-to-toe for all 25 minutes, but that's unrealistic for a lot of fights. Sometimes the more skilled the fighters, the less exciting the fight. They equalize each other, or in this case, from what I read, one guy was way ahead on the scorecards, so why take chances in the last third of the fight?"

Kizer might change his mind after watching the fight, but for now, the NSAC is taking no action against Silva. White, on the other hand, has threatened to put the middleweight champion on the undercard instead of having him headline events. In addition, White has taken a potential fight against Georges St. Pierre off the table for the foreseeable future.

 |  (11) Comments Mickey knox: Why would this fucktard even make a statement before seeing the fight? This might be an indicator of the intelligence of the guys making the rules. Juzie: Why the fuck did this interview even take place, he hasn't even seen the fight. mma3dge: he may not have broken rules... but he broke my heart :( smallest violin playing for me D_V: I don't think it really matters if it is a rule or not because it's pretty much ridiculous. I don't like silva but if it was a rule he broke, i wouldn't care. MAStudent: I saw some show on how Dana had to pursue getting MMA sanctioned, etc. My impression is they had to PAY the guys that sanction boxing, etc, to sanction MMA. Not because the sanctioning bodies know ANYTHING about MMA, but just because they hold the regulatory position. Its their ball. If we want to play ball, we have to pay them. I think of it as an ante. MMA is legit? OK then, MMA, ante up! So of course dipshit Keith Kizer doesn't know a damn thing about this fight and didn't bother to watch a potentially pivotal, historical UFC. Held in the heart of Grappling country in Abu Dhabi, with several Grade A grapplers and prior Abu Dhabi contestants on hand in BJ, Maia, Gracie, Hughes, etc, and with further forays into the Middle east in the balance with new middle eastern UFC partners at the table. Chaps my hide.
HOW WILL THE THIAGO ALVES VS. MARTIN KAMPMANN FIGHT END AT UFC ON FX 2?
Alves def. Kampmann via TKO/KO
Alves def. Kampmann via submission
Alves def. Kampmann via decision
Kampmann def. Alves via TKO/KO
Kampmann def. Alves via submission
Kampmann def. Alves via decision
TAKE ANOTHER POLL!